Farmina N&D dog food and cat food in India

At a glance

The table below is what can be established about this brand from primary records, and what cannot. Every row reading "Not established" is written up in full at the foot of the page, with what was looked for and where.

Where it is made

Origin is recorded per product, not per brand, because it varies per product. The evidence column says how strong each row is: a pack in hand outranks a filing, and a marketplace listing is the weakest thing here that is still evidence.

What it costs in India

Each row is one seller's listed price for one pack size on one date, converted to a price per kilogram so the pack sizes compare. Indian marketplace pricing moves, so a single listing is not a price and none of these is quoted on its own.

• Petsworld, Farmina N&D Pumpkin Lamb & Blueberry, adult medium and maxi, 12 kg. Cheapest of the five by Rs 1,451, and the cheapest verified Farmina rate per kilogram in India. This seller also lists a separate "12+3 Kg" promotional pack, which is a bundle rather than a pack size and is excluded from this comparison.
• Supertails, Farmina N&D Pumpkin Lamb & Blueberry, adult medium and maxi, 12 kg. 15.5 percent above Petsworld. This seller carries 144 Farmina products and also lists "12kg+100g Treat" and "7kg+60g Treat" variants, whose bundled treat must be kept out of any per-kilogram figure for the food.
• Heads Up For Tails, Farmina N&D Pumpkin Lamb & Blueberry, adult medium and maxi, 12 kg. 18.4 percent above Petsworld. This seller's statutory block names GOA Medicos Private Limited as Imported & Marketed by, matching Farmina's own distributor page.
• Zigly, Farmina N&D Pumpkin Lamb & Blueberry, adult medium and maxi, 12 kg. Dearest of the five, 27.1 percent above Petsworld, and out of stock on this variant when read. Identical to the rupee to Petsy's price for the same bag, which is recorded rather than explained.
• Petsy, Farmina N&D Pumpkin Lamb & Blueberry, adult medium and maxi, 12 kg. The same Rs 11,871 as Zigly. This seller's page declares Country of Origin Italy and names Goa Medicos Private Limited as importer, and carries two AAFCO references that Farmina's own India pages do not make.
• Petsworld, Farmina N&D Pumpkin Lamb & Blueberry, adult medium and maxi, 2.5 kg. At the same seller the small bag costs 28.8 percent more per kilogram than the 12 kg, so trying the food in a small pack before committing has a real cost.
• Heads Up For Tails, Farmina N&D Pumpkin Lamb & Blueberry, adult medium and maxi, 2.5 kg. Dearest 2.5 kg of the sellers read, 31.7 percent above Petsworld on the same pack, and 69.7 percent more per kilogram than Petsworld's 12 kg bag.
• Petsworld, Farmina Matisse Kitten dry cat food, 10 kg. Matisse is Farmina's lower-priced line and this is the cheapest rate per kilogram found for the brand in India on any pack.
• Zigly, Farmina Matisse Kitten dry cat food, 10 kg. Out of stock when read. The cat range spreads 14.2 percent across four sellers, the narrowest spread on this brand.
• Heads Up For Tails, Farmina Matisse Kitten dry cat food, 10 kg. The same seller also lists a "1.5kg+5kg Scoopy Litter" style bundle elsewhere in the range; bundling heavy cat litter with food is the shape that most distorts a per-kilogram figure, and all such rows are excluded here.
• Supertails, Farmina Matisse Kitten dry cat food, 10 kg. 14.2 percent above Petsworld for the same bag, the dearest of the four carrying it.

Recall checks

Each register below was searched for this brand, and then searched again for something comparable to prove it answers at all. A register that returns nothing for both has cleared nothing. India maintains no pet food recall register, so no row here can stand in for one.

An Italian family company, with an English name and a Dutch holding

Farmina is made by Russo Mangimi S.p.A. of Nola near Naples, owned by the Russo family rather than a conglomerate, held through a Dutch holding company, and carrying a brand name its own history page says came from an English firm.

The operating company, from its own statutory block. Farmina's India terms page gives "Via Nazionale delle Puglie 80035 - Nola (NA) Italy VAT number: 01239651217" with a paid-up share capital figure, for Russo Mangimi S.p.A.. A second terms page on the same India site is governed by Netherlands law and names Farmina Pet Foods Holding B.V. of Amsterdam.

The family, from the company page. Farmina's own history names Francesco Russo, who founded Russo Mangimi as an animal nutrition company in 1965, and Angelo Russo, who moved it into pet food in 1999. No private-equity or trade investor was found, and no shareholder register was read, so family ownership is recorded as what the company says rather than as something independently verified.

The detail no Indian page carries. The first line of Farmina's own company page is "We are Italians". A few paragraphs later the same page says Angelo Russo "began an ambitious route that drove him to start a collaboration with Farmina, an English company specializing in research and formulating food for dogs and cats, which brought skills, trademarks and know-how". So the company is Italian and the Farmina name and trademarks are, on the company's own account, English in origin. Both are true, and the second is the kind of small checkable fact that is worth more than a slogan.

The scientific partner is named, which is rarer than it should be. Farmina credits the Chair of Animal Nutrition at the University of Naples Federico II across its site. A named institution can be checked and asked; the anonymous panels of experts other brands cite cannot.

The Indian range covers both species and every life stage. On the dog side N&D Ancestral Grain, Pumpkin, Ocean, Quinoa, Tropical Selection and Low Grain lines, plus Cibau and Vet Life; on the cat side N&D Prime, Ocean, Quinoa and Pumpkin, plus Matisse and Vet Life feline, in pack sizes from 300 g to 12 kg. N&D is a range rather than a single product, so comparing "Farmina N&D" with a single recipe from another brand compares a family with a member.

Made in Italy, and the maker will not say which factory

Five Indian sellers declare Italy and name Russo Mangimi at Nola, which is unusually consistent, while Farmina's own help page says it has four factories and lists three.

What the pack says, and how many sellers agree. Supertails prints "Country of Origin: Italy" with "Name & Address of Manufacturer: N&D, Russo Mangimi Spa Farmina Pet Foods Italia, Via Bosconfangone, Nola, Napoli, Italia +39 081 512 2135";. Heads Up For Tails, Zigly, Petsworld and Petsy all declare Italy as well Zigly, Farmina Vet Life product page Petsy, Farmina N&D Grain Free Pumpkin Lamb…. The Nola address they print matches the registered address in Farmina's own statutory terms block.

But the company's own page contradicts itself on how many factories it has. Farmina's help centre, read today, says: "Farmina produces its pet food in four proprietary factories worldwide, located in Nola (Italy), Belgrade (Serbia), and Sao Paulo (Brazil).". It says four and names three, so the fourth is unnamed. The one it omits is almost certainly Reidsville, North Carolina, which a US federal enforcement record independently proves exists and makes N&D. That is an error on the page rather than evidence of concealment, and the consequence for a reader is that the brand's own answer to "where do you make it" is incomplete.

Why it matters for this brand specifically. Farmina runs plants on three continents and India's listings declare Italy, but one origin for one recipe is not one origin for a range. A different N&D line, or a later shipment, could come from Belgrade or Sao Paulo, and the plant code is the only thing that settles a given bag. The brand also claims its chicken "comes from Italian chicken reared in open (with GMO Free diet) fresh from slaughter", a claim that reads differently if a given bag was filled in Brazil.

The one imported brand whose maker names its Indian importer

Farmina's own distributor page returns exactly one result for India, GOA Medicos Private Limited of Gurugram, and the same company appears on all five sellers' listings.

Three independent directions agreeing. Farmina's distributor page returns "found 1 stores: GOA Medicos Private Limited, Tower B, Floor 15, Unit 001, 002 & 003, EMAAR Digital Greens, Golf Course Ext. Road, Sector 61, Gurugram, HARYANA 122002";. Supertails prints the same company and address under both "Imported by" and "Marketed by"; Heads Up For Tails under "Imported & Marketed by"; Zigly and Petsy name it too Heads Up For Tails Petsy, Farmina N&D Grain Free Pumpkin Lamb….

Who GOA Medicos is, from the register. CIN U51397HR1996PTC133746, incorporated 11 September 1996, Active, Registrar of Companies Haryana, authorised and paid-up share capital Rs 20,000,000 each, last annual general meeting 30 September 2025, last balance sheet recorded as filed 31 March 2025, activity code 5139 for wholesale trade.

Read that table fairly. Neither company is accused of anything, both are ordinary private limited companies, and a registry activity code is chosen at incorporation and often never updated. What the comparison shows is how much more a buyer can find out about the Farmina chain than about the Champion one, and that difference comes from the manufacturer's own disclosure rather than from anything the companies did.

One defect, on the page where it matters most. Farmina's India privacy policy names GOA Medicos as the data controller twice, each time as "a company having registered office at 15th FLOOR, DGB-001/002/003/004, Tower B, Emaar Digital Greens, Sector 61, Gurugram, Haryana CIN: U51397DL 1996PTC081819";. That CIN is the company's superseded one, from when it was registered in Delhi; the current Haryana CIN does not appear on the page at all. So the brand pairs a Haryana address with a Delhi identifier, and a reader exercising a data-protection right would be quoting a retired number for the entity holding their data.

Nothing says who the importer is on the one page a buyer reads first. The brand's India site carries the distributor lookup, which has to be searched, and the product pages themselves carry no importer. The chain is disclosed but it is not surfaced.

The same 12 kg bag costs Rs 9,341 or Rs 11,871

Five Indian sellers price N&D Pumpkin Lamb & Blueberry 12 kg between Rs 9,341 and Rs 11,871, a spread of 27.1 percent, and two of them charge exactly the same figure.

The five, cheapest first. Petsworld Rs 9,341, Supertails Rs 10,792, Heads Up For Tails Rs 11,062, then Zigly and Petsy both at Rs 11,871 Supertails, the shop's own Shopify product… Heads Up For Tails Zigly, the shop's own Shopify product data… Petsy, the shop's own Shopify product data…. That is Rs 778.42 to Rs 989.25 per kilogram, a difference of Rs 2,530 on one bag.

Buying small is expensive here too. The same recipe in 2.5 kg runs Rs 1,002.80 to Rs 1,320.80 per kilogram across the same sellers, against Rs 778.42 to Rs 989.25 for the 12 kg Supertails, the shop's own Shopify product…. At the cheapest seller the small bag costs 28.8 percent more per kilogram than the big one, so trying a new food in a small bag has a real cost attached.

Two sellers at an identical figure, and they are the dearest. Zigly and Petsy both charge Rs 11,871 on this bag, to the rupee, and are unrelated retailers. Being jointly dearest by Rs 809 over the next seller is worth noting rather than explaining, because the obvious reading, that both are pricing at a common distributor reference, is a reading and not something any page states.

The cat range, for completeness. Farmina Matisse Kitten in 10 kg runs Rs 6,672 at Petsworld, Rs 6,908 at Zigly, Rs 7,093 at Heads Up For Tails and Rs 7,622 at Supertails, which is Rs 667.20 to Rs 762.20 per kilogram, a spread of 14.2 percent and the narrowest on this brand.

Against the rest of this directory. The cheapest verified Farmina N&D is Rs 778.42 per kilogram. Kennel Kitchen's kibble, the cheapest dry dog food in this research, is Rs 179.67 per kilogram, so Farmina costs 4.3 times as much. It sits between Acana at Rs 703.38 and Orijen at Rs 849.94 on the same measure.

One recall, in 2026, that was never publicly announced

Farmina's US subsidiary recalled 8,051 bags of N&D Tropical Selection in March 2026 because the ingredient panel listed lamb while the front of the bag listed salmon, and FDA's record states that no press release was issued.

The record, field by field, read from FDA's own enforcement database today. Recall number V-0119-2026. Product: "Farmina Pet Foods N&D TROPICAL SELECTION salmon, spelt, oats and tropical fruits recipe Net Wt 22lb UPC 8 01027 60423 85. Dog Food." Reason: "Mislabeled Dog Food. The ingredient panel on the back list lamb while the front panel of the product list salmon." Quantity: 8,051 22 lb bags. Classification: Class III. Voluntary, firm initiated. Initial firm notification: E-Mail. Distribution: "Product was shipped to the following states: IL, MN, PA & TN." Recalling firm: Farmina Pet Food USA LLC. Recall initiation date: 25 March 2026.

Was any of it sold in India? No. FDA's own distribution field names four US states, Illinois, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Tennessee, and the recalling firm is the American subsidiary manufacturing in North Carolina. This page states that plainly rather than leaving a reader to infer a link to the Italian-made product sold in India.

It has since been completed. The status field now reads "Terminated" with a termination date of 28 August 2026, where this project's August research, reading the same record the day before, recorded it as ongoing. FDA also classified it late: its update history shows the classification changing from "Not Yet Classified" to Class III on 10 April 2026, sixteen days after the recall began.

A detail that changes how to search this brand. FDA's own product description reads "Manufactured by: Famina Pet Food USA, LLC", misspelling the company, while the recalling-firm field spells it correctly. This project has recorded the identical misspelling in trade-press coverage of a different Farmina story, so it is a recurring transcription error attached to this brand rather than one journalist's typo, and searching Famina as well as Farmina is a required step.

What has not been searched, which matters more here than usual. The Indian product is made in Italy, so the European Union's RASFF system and the Italian authorities are the regulators with jurisdiction over the plant that made it, and neither was readable: the RASFF portal returns a JavaScript shell with no readable terms. The Serbian and Brazilian regulators, for the other plants, were not searched either. So this page reports what the US FDA register holds, a recall of a US-made lot, and states no result at all for the registers that cover the Italian plant, because an unreadable register produces no finding in either direction.

One adverse-event record, recorded only so it is not mistaken for more. FDA's CVM adverse event reports for May 2020 to May 2021 contain a line reading "Farmina N&D lamb, Dilated Cardiomyopathy - rule out nutritional", for a Mastiff reported in April 2021. An adverse event report is submitted by a member of the public or a vet. It is not an FDA finding, it establishes nothing about causation, and it is a single line. It is noted here because a later reader who finds it should know it was seen and weighed, not because it supports any conclusion.

The India site is a brochure with European small print

Farmina's Indian website has no prices, no basket and a store locator that returns 404, and its terms page is European consumer-law boilerplate last updated in May 2018.

What is actually there. farmina.com/in loads and lists the N&D, Vet Life, Matisse and Cibau ranges in its navigation. Read today it carries no price on any product, no add-to-cart control, and its store locator returns HTTP 404. The distributor lookup does work, and returns GOA Medicos.

What the small print says instead. The India terms page grants a 14-day right of withdrawal and a 24-month guarantee of conformity, which are European constructs, points consumers to the European Commission's online dispute resolution platform, addresses its statutory withdrawal form to Russo Mangimi S.p.A. in Nola, and sets governing law as the place of the owner's registered offices. Mid-document it says "Deliveries with in India are free" and gives an india@farmina.com cancellation address. Its own footer reads "Latest update: May 22, 2018";.

A standard the brand does not cite, and its retailers do. Nothing on Farmina's India pages read here references AAFCO, and nothing references IS 11968:2019 either. Yet the Supertails Farmina listing carries five AAFCO references and the Petsy listing two Petsy, Farmina N&D Grain Free Pumpkin Lamb…. So the American benchmark that appears beside this brand in India is being added by the shops rather than claimed by the manufacturer, which is the reverse of the pattern on Carniwel and Felix, where the brand itself makes the claim.

What the brand competes on instead. Its own framing is provenance and science partnership, the University of Naples collaboration, its raw-material pages and its own technology and controls, rather than conformity to any published standard. That is a legitimate position and worth naming, because it means there is no third-party specification to hold this brand to and the buyer is being asked to trust the company.

One consumer promise with its catch, stated in full. Farmina publishes a satisfaction guarantee offering replacement if a pet will not eat the food, provided no more than 20 percent of the bag has been used and with transport costs borne by the buyer. The promise is specific and the condition is stated, so both halves are reproduced here; a description that omitted the 20 percent limit and the transport cost would not be describing the same promise.

What Indian law requires of an imported pet food

Farmina enters India under an animal-health import regime administered by the agriculture ministry rather than the food regulator, and one of its requirements bites on a specific Farmina ingredient.

Pet food is not legally food in India. The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 defines food for human consumption and excludes animal feed, so the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India sets no compulsory nutritional standard for dog or cat food.

The Indian standard is voluntary and this brand does not cite it. IS 11968:2019 is the Bureau of Indian Standards specification for extruded pet food and conformity is not compulsory. No BIS, ISI or IS 11968 reference was found on farmina.com/in or on any Indian listing read here.

The import regime applies squarely. The Animal Quarantine and Certification Service publishes India's import procedures and names the Pet Food Products of Animal Origin (Import into India) Order, with a Sanitary Import Permit required for high-risk products and pet foods listed as item 6, plus an official health certificate from the country of origin. A United States government guide for exporters sets out the substance: a permit held by the Indian importer, heat treatment to at least 70 degrees Celsius for at least 30 minutes or an approved equivalent, exclusion of ruminant material beyond milk and certain rendered fats, and inspection of the production facility.

The counter-intuitive result, as on the other imported brands. A bag of Farmina faces a permit, a heat-treatment specification, ingredient exclusions and a plant inspection. A pet food manufactured in India faces no compulsory product standard at all. The imported regime is the stricter of the two, it is an animal-health regime rather than a nutrition one, and none of it is visible to a buyer on any listing.

No FSSAI licence number appears anywhere. Not on farmina.com/in and not on any of the five Indian listings read here. For an imported product the licensable food business in India is the importer, GOA Medicos Private Limited, and nothing found suggests it does not hold a licence, so this is a disclosure gap rather than a compliance finding. Across every brand in this research the only licence number found on a pack belongs to Henlo.

What we could not establish

The 12 questions below are the ones this page could not answer, and they are published rather than left out. Each one names what was looked for, where, why it could not be settled, and the test that would show it if the answer were there.

Which of Farmina's factories made any given bag, and what the plant codes mean

A code-to-factory mapping, or a plant identification on an Indian pack

Looked in: Farmina's help centre, which states that each production facility has a unique code printed on the product label and does not publish the key, the five Indian listings, which declare Italy and name no plant, farmina.com/in, which publishes no mapping

Why it could not be settled: This is the highest-value unresolved item on the brand. The company has gone to the trouble of printing the answer on every bag and has not published the key, so a buyer holding the pack still cannot tell whether their food came from Nola, Belgrade, Sao Paulo or Reidsville. It also decides whether the brand's Italian-chicken claim applies to a given bag.

What would show otherwise: Farmina publishing the code-to-factory mapping would let any reader verify their own bag.

Which plant is the fourth one Farmina counts but does not name

A current list of the company's factories

Looked in: Farmina's help centre, which says four and names three, the FDA enforcement record, which proves a Reidsville, North Carolina plant exists and makes N&D

Why it could not be settled: The arithmetic on the company's own page does not work, and the obvious candidate is the North Carolina plant proven to exist by a US federal record. Obvious is not established, and this page does not close the gap by inference. It is recorded as an error on a brand page rather than as evidence of concealment.

What would show otherwise: A corrected list on Farmina's own page would close it.

Whether every N&D line sold in India comes from Italy

Origin declarations across the range rather than on one recipe family

Looked in: five sellers, all declaring Italy on the Pumpkin and Ancestral Grain lines read, Farmina's own factory list, which names plants on three continents

Why it could not be settled: One origin for one recipe family is not one origin for a range that includes Vet Life, Matisse, Cibau and the wet lines, and a later shipment of the same recipe could come from a different plant. The lines checked here are the Pumpkin and Ancestral Grain dry foods, and the finding should not be generalised beyond them.

What would show otherwise: Origin declarations read across the Vet Life, Matisse and Cibau lines would extend it.

What the EU RASFF and Italian registers hold for this brand

A searchable recall register covering the plant that makes the Indian product

Looked in: the EU RASFF portal, which returns HTTP 200 as a JavaScript shell with no readable terms, the Italian health ministry recall listings, which were not searched, the Serbian and Brazilian regulators, for the other plants, which were not searched

Why it could not be settled: The Indian product is made in Italy, so the European Union is the regulator with jurisdiction over the plant that made it, and the only register this page could read is the US FDA one, covering a United States subsidiary. The FDA recall of a US-made lot therefore tells an Indian reader nothing about the Italian plant, and no result is claimed for the registers that would.

What would show otherwise: RASFF answering a control term, or an Italian recall register searched with one, would close it.

Whether Farmina has earlier enforcement-report recalls

Pre-2026 FDA enforcement reports for this firm

Looked in: FDA's site search for farmina, which returns few documents and no earlier recall, the iRES enforcement database, which was read for the 2026 record but not enumerated for earlier years

Why it could not be settled: A Class III enforcement-report-only recall does not appear in FDA's ordinary site search, which is exactly how the 2026 one stayed invisible. So the absence of earlier results from that search is not evidence that no earlier recall exists, and this page does not state that the 2026 recall is the brand's only one.

What would show otherwise: An enumeration of the iRES database by firm across earlier years would settle it.

How the lamb N&D lines satisfy the BSE and scrapie certification requirement

Certification documentation for imported ovine ingredients

Looked in: the exporter guidance, which requires BSE- and scrapie-free certification for imported ovine or caprine ingredients, the Indian listings for the lamb recipes, which reference no certification, farmina.com/in, which publishes no Indian import documentation

Why it could not be settled: This is the one place in this research where the import rules bite on a specific product characteristic rather than on paperwork, because several N&D lines sold in India are lamb recipes and lamb is ovine. The requirement is established from the exporter guidance; whether and how these consignments satisfy it is not.

What would show otherwise: A consignment health certificate naming the ovine certification would close it.

Whether Farmina consignments enter India under a Sanitary Import Permit

A permit number, an import licence, or a consignment health certificate

Looked in: the Animal Quarantine and Certification Service procedures page, which names the Order and the permit requirement without publishing a register, all five Indian sellers, none of which references an import permit

Why it could not be settled: The regime requires the Indian importer to hold a permit and an official health certificate for each consignment. Whether these consignments have them is not established and no public register was located that would show it.

What would show otherwise: A permit number on an import document, or a published permit register entry, would close it.

Whether the Nola plant appears on India's approved-establishment list

An entry for Russo Mangimi's Nola facility on an Indian approved list

Looked in: the exporter guidance, which states that the production facility must be inspected, the Animal Quarantine and Certification Service procedures page, which publishes no plant register

Why it could not be settled: The regime requires facility inspection, so an approved-establishment list would in principle name the plant, and no such register was located or searched for this page.

What would show otherwise: The Indian department's approved-establishment list, searched for the Nola plant, would close it.

Whether GOA Medicos holds an FSSAI licence, and its number

A licence number on the brand's site or any Indian listing, or a FoSCoS entry

Looked in: farmina.com/in and its distributor page, the Supertails, Heads Up For Tails, Zigly, Petsworld and Petsy listings read here

Why it could not be settled: For an imported product the licensable food business in India is the importer. Nothing found suggests GOA Medicos does not hold a licence, and what is established is only that no page read publishes a number, so a reader cannot check it against the regulator's own register. FoSCoS was not queried.

What would show otherwise: A licence number on a pack, or a FoSCoS register entry for the importer, would close it.

Why Farmina's India privacy policy carries the importer's superseded CIN

The current Haryana CIN on the brand's India pages

Looked in: the India privacy policy, which names GOA Medicos twice as data controller with CIN U51397DL1996PTC081819 beside a Gurugram, Haryana address, the register, which gives the current CIN as U51397HR1996PTC133746 following the move from Delhi to Haryana

Why it could not be settled: A superseded corporate identifier on the page that names a data controller is a defect where it matters, because a reader exercising a data-protection right would quote a retired number. Whether it is a stale page or a different intention is not established, and the rest of the brand's disclosure on this importer is unusually good.

What would show otherwise: The current CIN appearing on that page would close it.

Whether Farmina Vet Life is sold in India under any veterinary supervision requirement

A statement of who may buy or dispense the therapeutic range in India

Looked in: Farmina's Vet Loyalty Programme and VetLife Portal, restricted to veterinarians and veterinary technicians, the Indian retailers, several of which list Vet Life openly alongside ordinary food

Why it could not be settled: A therapeutic diet is not an ordinary food, and the brand clearly routes the range through vets while retailers list it beside everything else. What Indian law requires, if anything, is not established, and this page makes no claim about it.

What would show otherwise: An Indian regulatory statement on therapeutic pet diets, or a seller's own restriction, would clarify it.

Why two unrelated sellers price the 12 kg bag identically

A reason for the Rs 11,871 figure appearing at two shops

Looked in: Zigly and Petsy, both at Rs 11,871 to the rupee on the same recipe and pack size, the other three sellers, at Rs 9,341, Rs 10,792 and Rs 11,062

Why it could not be settled: Two unrelated retailers landing on the same rupee figure is more likely to reflect a common distributor reference than coincidence, but that is a reading and no page states it. It is recorded rather than explained, and it does not affect any figure published here.

What would show otherwise: A published distributor price list would explain it.