Kennel Kitchen dog food in India

At a glance

The table below is what can be established about this brand from primary records, and what cannot. Every row reading "Not established" is written up in full at the foot of the page, with what was looked for and where.

Where it is made

Origin is recorded per product, not per brand, because it varies per product. The evidence column says how strong each row is: a pack in hand outranks a filing, and a marketplace listing is the weakest thing here that is still evidence.

What it costs in India

Each row is one seller's listed price for one pack size on one date, converted to a price per kilogram so the pack sizes compare. Indian marketplace pricing moves, so a single listing is not a price and none of these is quoted on its own. 3 rows each show a seller that stocks this product with nothing payable on the day it was read. Such a row is here because it evidences distribution, and it carries no price because a figure you cannot pay is not one.

• kennelkitchen.com (Gitwako Farms), Kennel Kitchen Chicken Chunks in Gravy, 80 g pouch, pack of 30. The brand's own price and the cheapest of the five, 14.6 percent below Amazon and Supertails and 20.5 percent below Heads Up For Tails. Compare-at price Rs 1,500. This reverses the pattern found on Bark Out Loud, Henlo and Fidele, where the owner's own storefront was dearest. The same Rs 1,050 buys the lamb version.
• Amazon.in, Kennel Kitchen Chicken Chunks in Gravy, 80 g pouch, pack of 30. ASIN B0CGMJG7BH. MRP Rs 1,500 with 18 percent off. Amazon prints its own unit price as Rs 51.25 per 100 g, which reconciles exactly with Rs 512.50 per kilogram. 4.1 from about 1,200 ratings, and 50 or more bought in the past month. Identical to Supertails because both take 18 percent off the same maximum retail price.
• Supertails, Kennel Kitchen Chicken Chunks in Gravy, 80 g pouch, pack of 30. Compare-at price Rs 1,500. This seller's 45-pack of the same pouch costs Rs 550.00 per kilogram, more than its 30-pack, while Heads Up For Tails prices those two packs the opposite way round.
• Heads Up For Tails, Kennel Kitchen Chicken Chunks in Gravy, 80 g pouch, pack of 30. Compare-at price Rs 1,500. Dearest of the four purchasable figures, Rs 270 above the brand's own. Its 45-pack falls to Rs 512.50 per kilogram, so this seller's ladder runs the expected direction and Supertails' does not.
• kennelkitchen.com (Gitwako Farms), Kennel Kitchen Chicken Chunks in Gravy, 130 g pouch, pack of 30. The cheapest wet food rate found on this brand, and 26.2 percent below the same seller's 80 g pouch at Rs 437.50. Compare-at Rs 1,800. The bigger pouch is better value per kilogram at every seller read, which is the opposite of what the familiar 80 g sachet suggests.
• Supertails, Kennel Kitchen Chicken Chunks in Gravy, 130 g pouch, pack of 30. Figure taken from this seller's 130 g 30-pack of the Supreme Cuts line, the closest comparable 130 g pack it stocks. Compare-at Rs 2,100.
• Supertails, Kennel Kitchen Chicken with Superfoods Adult Dry Dog Food, 3 kg. The cheapest dry dog food figure in this research, below Supercoat at Rs 184.50 and well below Petstar at Rs 392 and Fidele at Rs 713. Compare-at Rs 599. This seller charges the same Rs 179.67 per kilogram at 3 kg, 6 kg and 9 kg, and Rs 199.00 at 1 kg where it applies no discount.
• Supertails, Kennel Kitchen Air Dried Lamb Recipe, 2 kg. Up from Rs 2,000 on 27 August, a rise of about 90 percent, with the compare-at price unchanged at Rs 3,999 throughout. What ended was a near-half-price promotion. This is 2.92 times the brand's own listed price for the same bag, and the fastest-moving price found in this research.
• kennelkitchen.com (Gitwako Farms), Kennel Kitchen Air Dried Chicken & Mackerel Recipe, 2 kg. In stock, unlike the lamb, so this is the air-dried gap a buyer can actually act on: 1.31 times cheaper than Supertails. Compare-at Rs 1,999. The same seller's 6 kg at Rs 3,898 works out at Rs 649.67 per kilogram, fractionally more per kilo than the 2 kg, so the saving stops at 2 kg.
• Supertails, Kennel Kitchen Air Dried Chicken & Mackerel Recipe, 2 kg. Compare-at Rs 1,999, the same as the brand's own. Its 4 kg as two 2 kg bags is Rs 3,598, or Rs 899.50 per kilogram, so here the bigger pack costs more per kilo while on the lamb line at the same seller it costs less.
• Supertails, Kennel Kitchen Air Dried Chicken & Mackerel Recipe, 300 g. Compare-at Rs 399. The only pack size on this brand where Supertails undercuts the maker, by Rs 20, and the per-kilogram rate is 94 percent above the same recipe's 2 kg bag.
• kennelkitchen.com (Gitwako Farms), Kennel Kitchen Air Dried Chicken & Mackerel Recipe, 300 g. Sold at the full Rs 399 with no discount, where the same seller's 2 kg carries Rs 700 off. The trial pack is 2.05 times the 2 kg rate per kilogram, which is the ordinary small-pack premium and the reason the 100 g air-dried at Rs 2,990.00 per kilogram is not a useful comparison with anything.

Recall checks

Each register below was searched for this brand, and then searched again for something comparable to prove it answers at all. A register that returns nothing for both has cleared nothing. India maintains no pet food recall register, so no row here can stand in for one.

The brand owner is the manufacturer, which almost nothing else here can say

Kennel Kitchen belongs to Gitwako Farms (India) Private Limited, a Delhi company incorporated in 1976 that makes the food itself, so there is no importer and no contract manufacturer standing between the brand and the bag.

The company, from its own site and from the register. Kennel Kitchen's privacy policy identifies the operator as "Gitwako Farms (I) Pvt Ltd ( Kennel Kitchen)" and gives the address as 42 Birbal Road, Jangpura Extension, with a telephone number. The corporate record gives Gitwako Farms (India) Private Limited, CIN U74899DL1976PTC008277, incorporated 26 July 1976 at the Registrar of Companies in Delhi. The brand's own footer reads "Kennel Kitchen 2012 © All Rights Reserved", and its privacy policy is "effective from 24th February 2012";.

One phrase on a retailer's label settles the structure. Heads Up For Tails prints "Manufactured & Marketed By" followed by a single name, "Gitwako Farms Pvt Ltd, Khasra No 363-364, Vill Kesarpur, Burja, Alwar, Rajasthan-301001";. Both roles, one company. Every other brand in this research splits them, and four split them across countries: Fidele is specified in Pune and cooked in Belgium, Petstar in Wales, Supercoat in Thailand, and Bark Out Loud names no maker at all.

What Gitwako Farms is, which is the part nothing published mentions. A 1976-incorporated poultry and meat processing company with sites in Delhi, Alwar in Rajasthan and Nuh district in Haryana. A business already running meat lines and making wet food in retort pouches is vertically integrated in a way an importer cannot be, and the brand's own company page on LinkedIn describes it in those terms: "We manufacture and retail gourmet home style cooked pet food for our fury friends", listed under Food & Beverages at New Delhi. That is a self-description rather than a filing, and it is the only place the manufacturing claim is stated plainly.

The range covers both species and leans wet. Chunks in Gravy and Supreme Cuts in 80 gram and 130 gram pouches, Jelly pouches, Creamy Mousse and Creameroo for cats, extruded kibble, an air-dried line in chicken and mackerel and in lamb, soft-baked sticks, jerky and nuggets. Two life stage labels do most of the work, adult and all life stage, with puppy covered by the same all-life-stage recipes rather than a separate formula.

What the brand will not tell you itself. Its "Who we are" page and its terms page both returned HTTP 200 to a direct fetch on 13 October 2026 and neither yielded readable body prose to that method, so this page asserts nothing about what they do or do not contain. The ownership above rests on the privacy policy, which did render, on the corporate register, and on three sellers transcribing the maker's name from the physical label.

One company, five addresses, and the biggest seller names a flat

Five sellers print five different addresses for Gitwako Farms, and the one Supertails labels "Name & Address of Manufacturer" is the company's registered office in a Delhi residential colony rather than a factory.

The five, each read from the seller's own page. Supertails gives "GITWAKO FARMS (I) PVT. LTD, 42, BIRBAL ROAD, JANGPURA EXT. NEW DELHI - 110014.";. Amazon gives "Gitwako Farms (I) Pvt. Ltd. Rajgarh Road, Alwar - 301001, Rajasthan";. Heads Up For Tails gives "Khasra No 363-364, Vill Kesarpur, Burja, Alwar, Rajasthan-301001";. Amazon's packer field adds a second site, "Gitwako Farms (I) Pvt Ltd, Vill Chakrangala, Ferozpur Jhirka-122104,Distt.Nuh(Mewat), Haryana";. TailyAffairs prints that Haryana site as the manufacturer, spelled Firozpur Jhirka, alongside the Alwar one.

Read the first row against the sixth. Supertails sells four different Kennel Kitchen product types and names the same Jangpura address as the manufacturer on all four, including the extruded kibble and the retort-pouch wet food, which are not made on one line anywhere. A registered office is a legal address, not a plant. Heads Up For Tails and Amazon both name actual sites in Alwar, and Amazon's 1 kg kibble names two plants in one field, which is the most informative version of this label found anywhere.

A third way of filling the same field, on the same marketplace. Amazon's 80 gram wet 24-pack puts "Kennel Kitchen" in the manufacturer field, which is the brand name rather than a company, and relegates Gitwako Farms at Alwar to the packer line. So across five sellers this one field holds a registered office, two production sites, a brand name and, on the wet listings, the same company repeated into the importer slot. Each is a different way of answering the only question on the label that a buyer cannot check for themselves.

The Haryana site is new information. Vill Chakrangala, Ferozpur Jhirka in Nuh district appears on all three Amazon kibble listings and on TailyAffairs' product data, under two spellings, and in no earlier research on this brand. Two independent sellers naming it, one of them in the manufacturer field, is good evidence that Gitwako runs a second production site. Which site makes which product is not established.

One address could not be re-read. An earlier reading recorded "Manufactured & Marketed by: Gitwako Farms India Pvt Ltd, C-13 Okhla Industrial Area Phase-1, New Delhi-110020" on BigBasket. That page returned HTTP 403 to a direct client on 13 October 2026, so the Okhla site is named here as previously recorded and is not re-confirmed today.

Three sellers describe an Alwar-made food as an import

Supertails fills its "Imported by" field with the Indian manufacturer's own name, Blinkit labels the wet food "Imported", and a cross-border reseller sells it into India with customs duties included, all for a food its own label says is made in Rajasthan.

Supertails puts one Indian company in all three roles. On the kibble, the air-dried lamb, the wet chunks and the treats, the same value appears against "Name & Address of Manufacturer", against "Marketed by" and against "Imported by": GITWAKO FARMS (I) PVT. LTD at the Jangpura address. The same pages state "Country of Origin: India";.

That resolves a question rather than raising one. Earlier research found "Imported by" on a Kennel Kitchen treats listing and could not tell whether the treats line was genuinely imported or the retailer's field was wrong. Reading four product types settles it: the field carries the same domestic company everywhere, including on products whose Indian manufacture two other sellers confirm from the physical label. A product made in Alwar has no importer, so the field is template filler and not a fact about the goods.

Blinkit goes further and prints the word on the product. Its Kennel Kitchen wet food listing carries the label "Imported" beside the price. Blinkit is a quick-commerce platform with far more reach than any specialist pet shop, and "Imported" on an Indian-made food is the kind of label a buyer reads as a quality signal.

And one seller imports it into the country it was made in. Desertcart lists the 80 gram pack of 30 and states "Customs & duties included in the price", "We handle all customs clearance and use reliable courier partners", and that its prices "include international shipping costs, customs duties, payment processing fees";. It names Gitwako Farms on the same page. So a food manufactured in Alwar is being routed to Indian buyers as an international import with duty paid. Its price is rendered by script and was not readable, so no figure from it appears in the table below.

Why this pattern keeps appearing. The mirror image of it runs through this research: Supercoat's biggest Amazon listing never prints the word Thailand while calling the brand Australia's number one, and Fidele's Supertails listings declare the country of origin as USA beside a Belgian factory address. Retailer statutory fields are filled from templates, and they are wrong in both directions. The label on the physical pack is the only one with a legal duty behind it.

The cheapest dry dog food in this research, and the brand's own shop is cheapest on wet

Kennel Kitchen's kibble runs Rs 179.67 per kilogram at Supertails, below every other dry food priced in this research, and on wet food the brand's own storefront undercuts all three retailers.

The kibble, and the figure it sets. Supertails prices the Chicken with Superfoods adult kibble at Rs 539 for 3 kg, Rs 1,078 for 6 kg and Rs 1,617 for 9 kg, which is Rs 179.67 per kilogram at all three sizes, and Rs 199 for 1 kg. Amazon sells a 100 gram pack at Rs 18, or Rs 180.00 per kilogram. Against Supercoat at Rs 184.50, Bark Out Loud's Thai tier at about Rs 234, Petstar at Rs 392 and Fidele at Rs 713 and up, this is the cheapest dry food figure in the research, and it is domestically made.

The brand's own shop being cheapest is a reversal. Buying direct costs Rs 437.50 per kilogram against Rs 512.50 at Amazon and Supertails and Rs 550.00 at Heads Up For Tails, so the brand undercuts its cheapest retailer by 14.6 percent and its dearest by 20.5 percent Amazon.in, Kennel Kitchen Chicken Chunks… Supertails, the shop's own Shopify product… Heads Up For Tails. This research has recorded the opposite three times, on Bark Out Loud, Henlo and Fidele, where the owner's own storefront was the dearest place to buy. Kennel Kitchen breaks that pattern, which is worth knowing before applying the rule to a fourth brand.

Amazon and Supertails land on the same rupee figure because they take the same discount. Both show Rs 1,230 against a Rs 1,500 maximum retail price, and Amazon prints its own unit price as Rs 51.25 per 100 g, which is Rs 512.50 per kilogram exactly. Eighteen percent off Rs 1,500 is Rs 1,230. The same arithmetic produced matching figures at two shops on Supercoat, and it is a discount rate applied to one price list rather than two shops competing.

The pouch size matters more than the pack count. At the brand's own store a 30-pack of 130 gram pouches costs Rs 1,260 and works out at Rs 323.08 per kilogram, against Rs 437.50 for the 30-pack of 80 gram pouches, so the larger pouch is 26.2 percent cheaper per kilogram for the same recipe. The gap between sellers widens on that pouch rather than narrowing: Supertails' closest comparable 130 gram 30-pack runs Rs 1,848, or Rs 473.85 per kilogram, so the brand's own store is 31.8 percent below it on the 130 gram size against 14.6 percent below on the 80 gram. Amazon shows the extreme version: a single 130 gram pouch at Rs 45 is Rs 346.15 per kilogram, cheaper per kilogram than its own 30-pouch box of the 80 gram size at Rs 512.50. A buyer reaching for the familiar sachet pays about a quarter more per kilo than one reaching for the bigger pouch.

Two retailers price the same two packs as exact mirror images. On the 80 gram chunks, Supertails charges Rs 512.50 per kilogram for the 30-pack and Rs 550.00 for the 45-pack, while Heads Up For Tails charges Rs 550.00 for the 30-pack and Rs 512.50 for the 45-pack Heads Up For Tails. The same two rates, swapped. At Supertails the bigger case costs more per kilogram, which is the bigger-pack-costs-more pattern this research first recorded on Drools and has now seen on three brands, and at Heads Up For Tails the ordering is the expected one.

One brand name spans a 25-fold range per kilogram. From Rs 179.67 for the kibble to Rs 4,500.00 for the air-dried chicken jerky at Supertails. Extruded kibble, air-dried food, wet pouches and jerky are four different product classes and a figure that averages them means nothing, which is why they are separated here. The air-dried line is the subject of the next section, because its price did something worth recording.

The same 2 kg bag costs Rs 1,299 or Rs 3,799 depending where you buy it

Kennel Kitchen's air-dried lamb is Rs 1,299 on the brand's own site and Rs 3,799 at Supertails for the identical 2 kg pack, and the Supertails figure has risen about 90 percent since August because a half-price promotion ended while the stated maximum retail price never moved.

The two prices, both read from each shop's own product data. kennelkitchen.com lists Air Dried Lamb Recipe 2kg at Rs 1,299 against a compare-at price of Rs 3,999, which is Rs 649.50 per kilogram. Supertails lists the same 2 kg at Rs 3,799 against the same Rs 3,999, which is Rs 1,899.50 per kilogram. That is 2.92 times the brand's own price for the same bag.

The catch is in the stock column, and it matters more than the ratio. The brand's own 2 kg lamb at Rs 1,299 is marked unavailable, and Supertails' at Rs 3,799 is in stock Supertails, Kennel Kitchen Air Dried Lamb…. A price you cannot pay is not a price, so a reader cannot simply buy direct and save two thirds on this product today. The chicken and mackerel 2 kg at Rs 1,299 is in stock on the brand's own site, and there the 1.31 times gap against Supertails is live and actionable.

The Supertails figure has roughly doubled in seven weeks. A reading on 27 August recorded the 2 kg lamb at Rs 2,000 and the 4 kg at Rs 3,999, which were Rs 1,000.00 and Rs 999.75 per kilogram. Today they are Rs 3,799 and Rs 7,198. The compare-at price has not changed, so what ended was the discount: the bag was at about half of its stated maximum retail price in August and is at 95 percent of it now. Nothing about the food changed and the per-kilogram cost to a buyer rose about 90 percent.

Meanwhile the brand has delisted its own kibble. The two handles that carried Adult Chicken Dry Food at 1 kg for Rs 199 and 3 kg for Rs 399 in August both return HTTP 404 on kennelkitchen.com today, and the only kibble left in its catalogue of 36 products is a 100 gram pack of 12 at Rs 270, or Rs 225.00 per kilogram, marked out of stock. Supertails, Amazon and Flipkart all still sell the 1 kg and 3 kg. So the company that makes its own kibble has no purchasable kibble on its own storefront, while three retailers do, and the cheapest dry dog food figure in this research comes from one of those retailers rather than from the maker.

The air-dried ladder does not behave the way the kibble ladder does. On the brand's own store the chicken and mackerel runs Rs 2,990.00 per kilogram at 100 g, Rs 1,330.00 at 300 g, Rs 999.00 at 1 kg, Rs 649.50 at 2 kg and Rs 649.67 at 6 kg. The saving stops at 2 kg: the 6 kg bag costs fractionally more per kilogram than the 2 kg, so buying three 2 kg bags is marginally cheaper than one 6 kg. At Supertails the two air-dried lines run in opposite directions, with the lamb cheaper per kilogram at 4 kg than at 2 kg and the chicken and mackerel dearer.

Nobody publishes the name of the company that makes it

Searching from India for where Kennel Kitchen dog food is made returns nine results and not one of them names Gitwako Farms, and Google's own summary gives the city of the registered office and no company at all.

Page one, in order. Two of the brand's own product and home pages, Supertails' collection, the brand's Instagram, Amazon's store page, the brand's ingredients page, a Quora thread, the brand's LinkedIn page and a Tracxn company profile. The closest any of them comes to answering the question is Supertails, which says "Based in Alwar, Rajasthan, they understand what pets in India need and make their recipes with that in mind", and the brand's Instagram, which uses the phrase "made in india home grown sourced locally". Neither names the manufacturer.

Google's AI Overview answers the question and loses the company. It states that "Kennel Kitchen dog food is made in India, with its company headquarters and operations based in New Delhi, India", then breaks into a chatbot prompt asking for the reader's dog's age and breed. The India part is right. New Delhi is the registered office, the production sites named on the labels are in Alwar and in Nuh district, and the company's name appears nowhere in the summary. On Supercoat and Fidele the overview was more accurate than the results beneath it; here it is about as uninformative.

The one page-one result that asks the right question is ten years old. A Quora thread titled "What's the difference between Drools Focus and Kennel Kitchen brand puppy foods and why is Kennel Kitchen so cheap?" sits at position seven with more than thirty answers. Why it is cheap is answerable: the maker owns its own plants, runs meat processing already, and sells kibble at Rs 179.67 per kilogram through a retailer. None of that is in any of the nine results.

On the review query nobody independent has assessed it either. Page one is Amazon's store, the brand's own reviews page, a Reddit thread in r/IndianPets, a Flipkart review page that returns "No information is available for this page", an Instagram aggregation, the Heads Up For Tails collection and the Supertails collection. Supertails' own page answers the question with "Kennel Kitchen dog food can be a suitable option for some dogs, as the brand emphasizes fresh, regionally sourced ingredients and avoids artificial fillers", which is a retailer assessing a brand it sells. The Reddit thread is the only independent voice, and it is one cat owner saying "They have cleaner ingredients. Kennel Kitchen works for my cat- hes so picky".

The brand's name collides with a common noun, and Google notices. People Also Ask returns "Are kennels good or bad for dogs?" alongside "Is Kennel Kitchen dog food good?". Related searches include "Kennel kitchen founder" and "Kennel kitchen customer care number", which are both questions about a company nobody has published the name of.

No vet stands behind this brand publicly, and it does not claim one. Nothing read for this page names a veterinarian, a veterinary nutritionist or a vet-recommended claim, on the brand's own site or on any listing. That is a cleaner position than the one Fidele and Supercoat occupy, where a retailer asserts veterinary backing and names nobody, because a claim this directory would have to attribute and discount is simply absent. A reader who wants a vet's view on this food still has to ask their own vet.

The founding story rests on one aggregator. Tracxn gives "an unfunded company based in Delhi (India), founded in 2012 by Awral Beri";. The 2012 date is consistent with the brand's own copyright line and with a privacy policy effective from February 2012, and the founder's name appears in no other source read here. Gitwako Farms itself dates to 1976, so 2012 would be when the pet food brand launched inside an older company rather than when the company began. The founder's name is listed in what is not established.

What Indian law requires of a domestically made dog food

Kennel Kitchen is made in India, so the import rules that govern most brands in this research do not apply to it, no compulsory nutritional standard applies either, and the missing country-of-origin field on its Amazon listings is lawful here in a way it would not be on an imported bag.

Pet food is not legally food in India. The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 defines food for human consumption and excludes animal feed, so the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India sets no compulsory nutritional standard for dog food. Every nutritional claim on this brand sits outside a standard a reader can check it against, which is true of every brand in this research.

The Indian standard for kibble is voluntary and is the right one to look for here. IS 11968:2019 is the Bureau of Indian Standards specification for extruded pet food and conformity is not compulsory. For a domestically made extruded food this is the applicable voluntary standard rather than a foreign one, and no BIS, ISI or IS 11968 reference was found on kennelkitchen.com or on any listing read for this page.

The import regime does not apply, with one odd exception. The Pet Food Products of Animal Origin (Import into India) Order, 2008 and the Sanitary Import Permit regime that the Animal Quarantine and Certification Service administers govern pet food entering India. A food made in Alwar does not enter India. The exception is the cross-border reseller that charges customs duty to deliver it to Indian buyers, which is a quirk of that seller's logistics rather than a regulatory question about the product.

The missing country-of-origin field is lawful on this brand and would not be on an imported one. The Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules require a pre-packaged commodity to declare the country of origin where it is imported, together with the manufacturer, packer or importer, and the net quantity. None of the three Amazon kibble listings carries a country-of-origin field at all, and for a domestically made product that is not the omission it would be on Supercoat or Fidele. All three do name a manufacturer, a packer and a net quantity, which is the fuller part of the duty.

Retort-pouch wet food carries process controls the dry-food framework does not cover. Wet food in a sealed pouch is thermally processed, and the hygiene and process-control questions that raises are different from those for extruded kibble. Wet food is the centre of this brand's range. Nothing read for this page publishes a process authority, a sterilisation standard or an audit for it, and no Indian standard was found that sets one for pet food specifically.

No FSSAI licence number appears anywhere. Not on kennelkitchen.com, and not on the Amazon, Supertails, Heads Up For Tails, TailyAffairs or Desertcart listings read here. A manufacturer and marketer of pet food in India would be expected to hold a licence, and nothing found suggests otherwise, so this is a disclosure gap rather than a compliance finding. It is sharper for this brand than for the importers, because here the manufacturer is Indian and the licence would be its own. Across every brand in this research the only licence number found on a pack belongs to Henlo.

The recall history for this brand can only be checked against the wrong registers. Both checks below are American, and that is a harder limitation here than on any imported brand in this research: an Indian-made, Indian-sold food would appear in the openFDA food enforcement database or the US FDA animal and veterinary register only if it were also distributed in the United States, and this one is not. No Indian equivalent of those two registers was located to search instead, which is a limit of the Indian regime rather than a finding about this company.

What this brand does disclose, against what it omits. Gitwako Farms will disclose its identity on a privacy policy and on three sellers' statutory blocks, and it omits any FSSAI licence number, any plant allocation and any process standard for its wet line. Its sellers contradict each other about its address on five counts and about whether the food is imported at all. For a buyer the useful summary is that the company is knowable and its paperwork is not.

What we could not establish

The 12 questions below are the ones this page could not answer, and they are published rather than left out. Each one names what was looked for, where, why it could not be settled, and the test that would show it if the answer were there.

Which Gitwako site makes which product

An allocation of products to the company's named sites

Looked in: Amazon's 1 kg kibble, which names Alwar and Ferozpur Jhirka in one manufacturer field without saying which made it, Heads Up For Tails, which names Kesarpur in Alwar for wet cat food, Supertails, which names the Jangpura registered office for all four product types, TailyAffairs, which names Firozpur Jhirka for wet chunks

Why it could not be settled: Five addresses are established for one company and the mapping from product to plant is not. It matters because extruded kibble, air-dried food and retort-pouch wet food are three different processes that do not share a line, so the brand demonstrably runs more than one, and a reader cannot tell which site stands behind the bag in their hand. The registered office named by the largest specialist seller is certainly not a factory.

What would show otherwise: A plant list from the manufacturer, or batch codes traced to sites, would settle it.

What the brand's own terms and About pages say about its ownership

The body text of kennelkitchen.com's terms-conditions and who-we-are pages

Looked in: both pages, which returned HTTP 200 on 13 October 2026 and yielded no readable body prose to a direct fetch, the privacy policy on the same domain, which did render and does name Gitwako Farms

Why it could not be settled: An earlier reading recorded the terms page naming Gitwako Farms (India) Pvt. Ltd. as owner and operator and claiming incorporation "under the Companies Act, 2013", which would conflict with a 1976 incorporation under the 1956 Act. Neither the naming nor the discrepancy can be confirmed today, because the page's body did not reach this reader, and an absence read off a page that did not render is not a finding. The ownership claim on this page therefore rests on the privacy policy and the corporate register instead.

What would show otherwise: The terms page read with its body rendered would confirm both the owner statement and the Companies Act reference.

Who founded the Kennel Kitchen brand and in what year

A founder's name or a launch date from the company or a filing

Looked in: Tracxn, which gives 2012 and Awral Beri and is a single aggregator, the brand's footer, which reads 2012, and its privacy policy, effective February 2012, the corporate record, which dates Gitwako Farms to 1976 and names three directors

Why it could not be settled: Two independent signals put the brand at 2012 and none of them names a person except one aggregator profile. Gitwako Farms predates that by 36 years, so 2012 is a brand launch inside an older company rather than a founding, and publishing a founder's name on one aggregator's word would be treating a database entry as a biography. Naming nobody is not evidence that nobody founded it.

What would show otherwise: A statement from the company, or a dated trademark registration naming an applicant, would establish both.

Whether Gitwako's poultry and meat operation supplies its own pet food

A statement linking the parent's meat processing to the pet food inputs

Looked in: the brand's LinkedIn page, which says the company manufactures and retails pet food and does not mention poultry, the brand's product pages, which say ingredients are regionally sourced and name no supplier, the corporate record, which gives the company's activity classification and not its supply chain

Why it could not be settled: A meat processor making wet pet food is the obvious vertical-integration story and it is an assumption until someone says so. Regionally sourced is not the same claim as sourced from our own lines. The distinction matters because vertical integration is the most plausible explanation for the price, and this page prefers to leave the explanation open rather than assert the attractive version.

What would show otherwise: A statement from the company about input sourcing, or a plant description covering both operations, would establish it.

Why Blinkit labels an Indian-made food Imported

An explanation or a corrected label on that listing

Looked in: the Blinkit listing, which carries the word Imported beside the price, three other sellers' statutory blocks, which name an Indian manufacturer at Indian addresses, Supertails, which states Country of Origin India on four product types

Why it could not be settled: Four sources establish Indian manufacture and one platform's label contradicts it, so this page treats the label as wrong rather than reporting a second origin. What produced it is not established, and attributing it to a catalogue default or to carelessness would be unsupported. It matters because Imported reads as a quality signal to a buyer and this platform's reach is far wider than any specialist pet shop's.

What would show otherwise: A corrected listing, or a statement from the platform about how that field is populated, would establish the cause.

Whether the brand's own 2 kg air-dried lamb will return to stock at Rs 1,299

Confirmation that the brand's own price survives restocking

Looked in: kennelkitchen.com, which lists it at Rs 1,299 against a Rs 3,999 compare-at price and marks it unavailable, Supertails, which has it in stock at Rs 3,799 against the same Rs 3,999

Why it could not be settled: The 2.92 times gap between the two sellers is established and its usefulness to a buyer is not, because the cheap side of it cannot be bought today. An out-of-stock listing can return at its old price or at a new one, and a brand whose retailer is charging 95 percent of the maximum retail price has little reason to return at 33 percent of it. This is the single most consequential unresolved item on the brand.

What would show otherwise: The product read again once in stock would settle it.

Why the brand delisted its 1 kg and 3 kg kibble from its own store

A reason, or the products under different handles

Looked in: the two August handles on kennelkitchen.com, which both return HTTP 404, the brand's full catalogue of 36 products, which contains only a 100 g pack of 12 kibble, out of stock, Supertails, Amazon and Flipkart, which all still list the 1 kg and 3 kg

Why it could not be settled: A 404 establishes that the handles are gone rather than merely out of stock, and it does not say why. A company that makes its own kibble and sells none of it on its own site while three retailers sell it is unusual enough to record, and the explanations, from a channel decision to a packaging change to a reformulation, are not distinguishable from outside. No statement about it was found.

What would show otherwise: A statement from the brand, or the products reappearing under new handles, would establish it.

Desertcart's price for the 80 gram pack of 30

A readable selling price on that listing

Looked in: the Desertcart product page, which returned HTTP 200 and renders both its price and its stock state by script

Why it could not be settled: A search listing for the page displayed Rs 16,092, which would be about fifteen times the brand's own price for the same pack, and a figure that was never read from the page it belongs to does not get published here. The same seller's price was unreadable for the same reason on Supercoat. What is established from the page's own bytes is that it carries the product and describes it as a cross-border import with customs duties included.

What would show otherwise: The page read with its price rendered would give a usable figure.

Whether any FSSAI licence number exists for Gitwako Farms

A licence number on the brand's site or any retail listing

Looked in: kennelkitchen.com, including its privacy policy and product data, the three Amazon kibble listings, where the literal FSSAI does not appear, the Supertails, Heads Up For Tails, TailyAffairs and Desertcart listings

Why it could not be settled: An Indian manufacturer and marketer of pet food would be expected to hold a licence, and nothing found suggests otherwise. What is established is only that none of the pages read publishes a number, so a reader cannot check it against the regulator's register. This is a sharper gap for a domestic manufacturer than for an importer, because the licence would be the manufacturer's own.

What would show otherwise: A licence number printed on a pack or published by the company would close it.

What any Indian register holds for this brand or its maker

A public Indian pet food recall or enforcement register to search

Looked in: this page's two register checks, which cover the United States only, the Food Safety and Standards Act framework, which excludes animal feed from the definition of food

Why it could not be settled: This is the brand in this research for which the American registers are least appropriate, because the food is made in India and sold in India and would reach the openFDA food enforcement database or the US FDA animal and veterinary register only through distribution in the United States. No Indian equivalent of either register was located to search instead. That is a limit of the Indian regime rather than a finding about this company, and it means the recall history for a domestically made food is less checkable here than for an imported one.

What would show otherwise: An Indian pet food recall or enforcement register, searched with a control that returns rows, would close it.

The process authority and sterilisation standard behind the retort-pouch wet food

A thermal process standard, audit or certification for the wet line

Looked in: the brand's product data, which describes recipes and not processes, every retail listing read, none of which references a process standard, IS 11968:2019, which specifies extruded pet food and not thermally processed wet food

Why it could not be settled: Wet food in a sealed pouch is a thermally processed low-acid product, and that raises process-control questions that the extruded-kibble standard does not address. Wet food is the centre of this brand's range. Nothing read publishes a process authority or standard, and no Indian standard was found that sets one for pet food specifically, so this is a gap in the framework as much as in the disclosure.

What would show otherwise: A published process standard or third-party audit for the wet line would close it.

Whether the Okhla address is still on the pack

A re-reading of the BigBasket listing that carried it

Looked in: the BigBasket product page, which returned HTTP 403 to a direct client on 13 October 2026

Why it could not be settled: The Okhla industrial estate address was recorded from that page in an earlier reading and is the fifth distinct address for this company. It could not be re-read today, and a page that refuses a client is not a page that has changed. It is reported as previously recorded and marked as unconfirmed rather than dropped, because dropping it would quietly shrink a finding that was properly sourced when it was taken.

What would show otherwise: The BigBasket listing read again, or the address on a physical pack, would confirm it.